Skinny models are NOT attractive to men, and yes, this is contrary to the preferences of the fashion industry. Click here for an explanation: Why are fashion models so skinny?
What does this mean? Does this mean that I must go to a prom party or I will die? No, because proms require tuxedos, and tuxedos symbolize masculinity. Masculinity does not accept death as an option. Masculinity chooses bravery rather than death. So for this long, masculinity advocates bravery rather than death. Death is no one. Death is the end of all nature. Death is the end of your eternity.
So going to the prom, you meet a women. You stare at her. You reproduce. That's the end-all-be-all of masculinity. There is no where else for a man to go. It's just about compassion. Reproduction. Giving your best genes to a woman.
The woman is adored by your compassion. She has an orgasm. A huge blast. Coming from the fierce lights from the towers of the sea.
Competition, like in business, is the end-all-be-all of masculinity. Men must compete to survive. Men must compete to pass on their genes. Competition is the never-ending-cycle in which males participate. Life is like a football game, or a pool game, if you will. Life is just about that, to a man.
So what now? So what should be do now? Should a man compete, for ever eternity, to give their precious genes to a woman? Should a man live in sodomy and faith in which a man shares his compassion to his women? Or should a man be as promiscuous as possible to fertilize all those women with good genes? Which on you choose, it is your decision.
We're both rock stars!
Look at rock stars. They have all the women. It's virtually unlimited. There are women yelling at rock stars. Women are struggling, competing with one another, for a mating opportunity with those precious rock stars. It's a never-ending fight with jealousy, envy, and money. Women just can't get enough of those precious men. It's like that they are fiercely competing for their attention.
Look, just look at the media. There are many celebrities that women worship. That women follow, in every area of their life. They stalk them. They film every action they do. Almost every thing a celebrity does, it is revealed to the public. Things like "privacy" is non-existent to celebrities. This, as you may know, seems unfair to those celebrities. But hey, if they can pass on their genes to virtually unlimited women, they shouldn't care about privacy at all. After all, reproduction the utmost importance to the man. Everything else is supplementary.
Not only should celebrities they not worry about privacy, they shouldn't worry about intelligence, too. Celebrities should be happy even if they are unintelligent. After all, if celebrities can fertilize unlimited women, they shouldn't worry about their intelligence. Look, as long as they reproduce as much as possible, then things like "privacy" or "intelligence" for them would have no use in increasing their reproductive strategies.
And, hey, look at all those businessmen. They have all the power, they control more resources than almost all other men control, and get all the girls. Why is that? Why are business men so sexy? Isn't because women have an instinct for gold-digging? No. No way.
Then what is it? Isn't because it's an evolutionary instinct. Say, the women want men who can provide resources, and those men who controls business can provide the most resources for woman and their offspring? Isn't that? Isn't because women like men with all the resources so he can feed any offspring that she produce?
Close--but no cigar. Women don't like men who are rich because they have lots of money to provide for any children that she has. Women are attracted to rich men, not because of their rich resources in itself, but because wealth in an indicator of power.
Let's look at a rich man. A rich man has a high-status job. Usually, he is in the managerial/executive positions. Women like those men, because they have power over other men. Power of their subordinates, power over telling their employees what they do. So what's going on now? It's the power that women desire, and not their money. It's the power that they control more resources than other men. It's the power that they can purchase anything that they want, without going poor. It's sort of like "purchasing power", you know? Every heard of that term in economics? Yes.
So their "purchasing power" and control over their subordinates is what makes those men attractive. Also, those rich men also have "authority," which means that lots and lots of men look up to them. Respect their decisions. And never questions their choices that they make. This is a symbol of leadership, and dominance: not being afraid to tell other people what to do, and then people came respecting their decrees. (Not necessarily kissing their asses, but leadership by example.)
While the poor man has to work for another person, the rich men has people working for them. While the poor man is subordinate, the rich man is dominant over their employees. It's like a dominance hierarchy. First you have poor people being obedient to their rich bosses. And then you have the rich bosses controlling their less wealthy employees. See what this resembles? This perfectly resembles the pecking order of our ancestors. With the poor men being submissive. And the rich men being dominant. And this, is the reason why women like rich men.
Women are not power-hungry whores. They are not gold-diggers. They are just sexually attracted to rich men and athletic men. Those are the men who are more likely to have the highest quality genes. Those are the men who are deemed the most successful (which is reproduction-wise) during the Stone Age. So chill out. We all are the offspring of those rich ancestors. So chill out. And get off your arrogant podium. Thank you.
The faux business man: The perfect companion for the woman in faux fur.
So we now have the "faux businessman." Let's imagine a faux business man in a business suit. He's a poser. He looks like a business man, but he's not. He's just wearing a suit to get girls. All of them.
Really, but suits don't have a much luxurious look to it as suits did in the past. Look in the past: Suits are very expensive in the past. But suits aren't expensive right now. People can just buy a 100% wool suit at $200. That's what I found at 2011. So suits aren't an indicator of wealth as they used to be in the past. This may partially explain why suits are appearing less and less common: they are becoming a worthless indicator of wealth: you can just buy a polyester suit at $50 or a wool suit for $200. So even poor people can afford to wear a suit. So wearing a suit does not signify wealth as they used to be.
People are purchasing clothing which are more "designer-branded" rather than clothing made with a luxurious material, such as wool or linen. Even those wool trousers became an "old man's garment." That's what will happen as wool and silk becomes cheaper and cheaper with technology. People just don't think those materials are an indicator of your financial status anymore, so people will stop wearing them. So they instead chose "designer-brand clothing" which is a more accurate indicator of your economic rank.
Men wore suits in the past, but now they do not.
The sad thing is that people will continue to wear clothing. People won't be naked as they would be in their past. Bad luck. Bad luck. We won't be seeing any attractive women around anymore. That's because they wear clothing. Bad luck Bad luck.
That trend towards more "designer-label" clothing rather than luxurious materials will continue. Until leather Oxford shoes will became an "old-mans shoe" and eradicated. Until all khaki and wool trousers become replaced with those designer-brand sweatpants. Okay, sweatpants are not trendy right now. But they could become trendy after. Sure, sweat pants may look cheap. They may look like clothing that homeless people wear. But so are jeans. You know, jeans were originally worn by only laborers. But jeans became "adopted" as fashionable article of clothing as more and more celebrities wear them. So if jeans are "adopted" as a fashionable garment, then why not sweatpants?
Disclaimer: This post was intended to be a joke, and I do not advocate everything which is said here.
0 comments:
Post a Comment